Why we check our phones so much, Part 3: We’ve forgotten what boredom is for
On the doors that never get to open.
“The boredom gap has to close eventually.
But how we close it, and when, actually matters.”
Parts 1 and 2 of this series were about the active side of phone use: checking for evidence that we matter to someone, and scrolling away from feelings we’d rather not sit with. Both are about what the phone does for us in the moment we reach for it.
This one is about what happens in the moment just before we reach for it.
There’s a specific state that most of us now spend very little time in. It’s the gap between tasks, between thoughts, between the end of one thing and the beginning of the next. A few minutes of nothing in particular. Uncomfortable enough that the instinct is to close it, quickly, before it gets any louder. And the phone is designed precisely for that moment: immediate, reliable, asking nothing of us.
One reach for our phone, and the gap is gone. What’s also gone is whatever the gap might have lead to.
Because the gap isn’t empty. It’s where something else happens, and we’ve quietly arranged our lives so it almost never gets the chance.
A few months ago I was lying on my bed, too early for sleep, too restless to read, too impatient for a show or film. The usual exits were there, as was my phone. But that particular evening none of them had any pull, so I just lay in the uncomfortable middle of nothing in particular, too mentally fidgety to even opt for a scroll on my phone.
Calm, mostly. came from that evening.
Not from a scheduled creative session, or a well-rested Sunday morning with a notebook.
But from a Tuesday night of restlessness I couldn’t close, a gap I couldn’t fill, a state I was stuck in long enough that the mind stopped waiting for input and started doing something with the quiet instead. A name formed. Then a direction. Then a sense of something I wanted to build.
None of that was available earlier in the evening, when everything was fuller. It came through the boredom gap, and only because the gap had been left long enough to turn into something: tilled soil, waiting for a thought to drop in and take root.
The crispest ideas I’ve had, in writing and in work, have come from that same place. A particular kind of exhaustion and listlessness that tips into something else. A creative famishment, where the mind has run out of things to process and starts generating its own.
That state has a prerequisite. The gap has to be allowed to exist, and to deepen, past the point where it’s comfortable.
The phone closes it before that point arrives, almost every time.
This isn’t about distraction in the usual sense, as we’ve all heard that the phone distracts us. What’s harder to see is the timing of it: the specific moment it intervenes.
The boredom gap doesn’t need to last long before it becomes uncomfortable. A few minutes of stillness is enough for the mind to start producing things we’d rather not sit with: the weight of an unfinished task, the low hum of something we need to do, the vague feeling of not knowing what to do next. The instinct is to close that gap before whatever’s in there gets any louder.
The phone is perfectly designed for that moment. One reach and it’s gone. What we’ve stopped noticing is the cost of that. The creative and cognitive cost of a gap that never gets to run.
There’s an older word for what happens in a protected gap: incubation. The period between identifying a problem and arriving at a solution, where the logical mind steps back and something else takes over. It’s well documented and widely understood, and almost nobody protects it anymore, because protecting it means tolerating the discomfort that makes it possible.
We used to tolerate that discomfort by default. In a time before mobile phones, there was nothing as immediately stimulating to our senses. The queue, the commute, the waiting room: these were forced gaps, and the mind filled them the only way it could. Now every one of those gaps has an instant exit, and we take it. The incubation doesn’t happen, and we wonder why ideas feel thinner than they used to.
The phone isn’t the only exit option, but it is the most available, the most reliable, and the most socially invisible. Nobody notices us closing the gap. We barely notice it ourselves.
What I’ve started doing is leaving some gaps alone, as an experiment in what surfaces when the gap is allowed to run.
Sometimes nothing grows from it, and that’s ok. Sometimes the discomfort just sits there and then passes, and I might still pick up the phone. But sometimes something comes through that couldn’t have arrived any other way. A line, or a direction. A thing I needed to know that I wouldn’t have found by looking for it.
The gap has to close eventually, and that’s not the point. What is, is that we get to decide how and when we close it. Just by pausing and stepping off the ‘reach for the phone’ autopilot script we’ve embedded within ourselves.
The phone will always be there when we reach for it. That’s the one guarantee of the whole arrangement. The question is whether we reach before the gap has finished what it started.
Most of the time, we do. Most of the time, by a long way.
Three things to try.
Leave one gap alone this week.
A commute, a queue, a few minutes before sleep. No phone, no podcast, no input of any kind. Notice what the mind does when it runs out of things to process.Track what arrives in the nothing.
Keep something nearby to capture whatever surfaces in an unstructured moment: a note, a voice memo, a scrap of paper. Not to force it. Just to notice whether something comes through that wouldn’t have arrived any other way.Notice the timing of the reach.
The next time you pick up the phone without a specific reason, ask how long the gap had been open. Ten seconds? Two minutes? The answer is usually shorter than you’d expect.
Enjoyed this post? Check out the Calm, mostly. workbook:
‘Becoming calmer. A practical guide to feeling steadier, and helping the people around you feel the same.’